<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Purchasing Auctions Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purchasing-blog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purchasing-blog.com</link>
	<description>Reverse Auctions and a bit of fun...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on No Resource, No Budget &#8211; No Problem! If you want to deliver significant savings using Reverse Auctions but are constrained by resource or budget &#8211; we have a solution for you! by Jonathan Rollason</title>
		<link>http://www.purchasing-blog.com/2010/06/no-resource-no-budget-no-problem-if-you-want-to-deliver-significant-savings-using-reverse-auctions-but-are-constrained-by-resource-or-budget-we-have-a-solution-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rollason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.purchasing-blog.com/?p=51#comment-145</guid>
		<description>The first time I used the auction site I was embarrassed by the level of saving achieved. My stationery fell from £240,000 to £130,000 and the service and product were good. It is just a great way of delivering quick savings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I used the auction site I was embarrassed by the level of saving achieved. My stationery fell from £240,000 to £130,000 and the service and product were good. It is just a great way of delivering quick savings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Jonathan Rollason</title>
		<link>http://www.purchasing-blog.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rollason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purchasing-blog.com/?page_id=2#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I think reverse auctions are still in there infancy. Best in class companies seem to be putting about 15% of their spend through reverse auctions and typically achieve 20% more savings than over the conventional tendering route.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think reverse auctions are still in there infancy. Best in class companies seem to be putting about 15% of their spend through reverse auctions and typically achieve 20% more savings than over the conventional tendering route.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

